HS Code for Basmati Rice and Import Duty by Market

Two different questions get tangled under "HS code for basmati rice": which code to put on the paperwork, and how much duty that code actually triggers at your port. This guide answers both, for the markets that matter most to Indian basmati — the USA, the UK, and the Saudi Arabia/UAE-led Gulf — and flags two genuine 2026 changes that most HS-code reference pages online haven't caught up with yet: a new US tariff that took effect in July, and a UK-India trade agreement that entered into force the same month. If you already know your grade and just need the process (contract to port), our import guide covers that; this one is about classification and cost.

The countries below are India's largest basmati destinations by export share, and every one of them applies its own duty treatment to the same underlying product — which is exactly why "the HS code for basmati rice" isn't a single number you can quote once and reuse.

How does basmati's form affect its HS classification?

At the 6-digit level recognised worldwide, basmati sits under 1006.30 — semi-milled or wholly milled rice, whether or not polished or glazed. India's own export schedule carves out an 8-digit line specifically for it, 1006 30 20 ("Rice Basmati"), distinct from 1006 30 90 for other milled rice, because basmati's geographical-indication status (the Punjab-Haryana growing belt covered in our India vs Pakistan comparison) makes it a genuinely different product for trade-policy purposes, not just a quality grade of ordinary rice.

Destination countries then build their own classification on top of the same 1006.30 heading, and the split is not always where you'd expect. The clearest case is the United States: parboiled rice (sella and golden sella, by processing method) generally falls under HTS 1006.30.10, carrying an 11.2% ad valorem duty, while basmati itself — raw or steam, not parboiled — is picked out specifically as "Basmati" under 1006.30.90.59, part of the 1006.30.90 "other" group taxed at a flat 1.4 US cents per kilogram regardless of value. A lot of commercial basmati moves as sella or golden sella, which means the processing method on your purchase order isn't just a spec detail — it can determine which of two very different duty structures applies. Aging (12 or 24 months) and grain-length/L-B-ratio specification don't change the classification; parboiling does.

Organic basmati has its own US sub-line too (1006.30.90.15, "Certified Organic"), inheriting the same 1.4-cent rate as conventional basmati — the split exists for trade statistics and labelling verification, not a different duty. The lesson that travels across every market: tell your supplier and your broker the exact form (raw, parboiled/sella, organic or not) before the HS line is picked, because the code follows the product's processing, not its marketing name.

Why did basmati's import duty change in 2026?

Two unrelated policy actions, both taking effect in July 2026, changed what Indian basmati actually costs to land in its two largest non-Gulf markets. In the United States, the Office of the US Trade Representative's final Section 301 forced-labor action — published in the Federal Register on 28 July 2026 — added a 10% ad valorem duty on products of India, effective for goods entered for consumption on or after 24 July 2026, on top of each product's existing most-favoured-nation rate. We opened the Federal Register notice directly: it sets India's rate at 10%, the lower of the two tiers USTR applied across 60 economies (the higher tier, 12.5%, went to economies judged to have done less on forced-labor enforcement). The notice carves out specific exclusions in its Annexes, and we could not confirm line-by-line from the annex text itself whether every basmati sub-heading is covered or excluded — trade-compliance trackers that specialise in HTS-to-301 mapping list milled basmati against the India-specific Chapter 99 line, which is consistent with no blanket rice exemption, but treat that specific pairing as one tier below a primary-source read.

In the UK, the opposite kind of change happened: the UK-India Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) entered into force on 15 July 2026, nine days before the US tariff took effect. The UK government's own announcement states 99% of Indian goods entering the UK become duty-free or see reduced tariffs from that date, and Indian and UK trade press reported basmati rice as one of the products India specifically negotiated duty-free access for. As of this review, the UK's public Trade Tariff lookup tool had not yet shown an India-specific preferential line against basmati's commodity codes — plausibly a data-publishing lag rather than a sign the reporting is wrong, but worth re-checking directly rather than assuming the trade-press framing has already been applied line-by-line.

How much extra duty do 2026's tariff changes actually add?

The mechanism matters more than any single figure, because the two 2026 US duties behave completely differently. The base HTS 1006.30.90.59 rate — 1.4 US cents per kilogram — is a flat specific duty: it doesn't change whether your basmati is priced high or low this season. The new Section 301 duty is the opposite: it's 10% of the shipment's customs value, so it rises and falls with price. If you negotiated a US-bound contract before 24 July 2026 on the assumption that only the small per-kilogram duty applied, that assumption is now out of date — the ad valorem add-on is, for almost any realistic basmati price level, a larger cost than the base duty ever was, and it has to be re-quoted into your landed-cost math, not treated as a rounding error on top of it.

For UK-bound orders, the arithmetic risk runs the other way: if your broker or customs agent is still quoting the UK's standard £121-per-1,000kg third-country rate from before 15 July 2026, you may be over-budgeting, not under-budgeting — provided your shipment can actually claim the CETA preference once the correct certificate of origin is in place. Ask your broker to re-quote under the agreement explicitly rather than carrying forward a pre-CETA number by default.

Get a live quote

What goes wrong when buyers get the HS code or duty math wrong

The most common mistake is treating "HS code for basmati rice" as a single lookup rather than a per-market question. A buyer who finds 1006.30.90.59 for the US market and assumes the same number applies at their own country's customs desk is wrong twice over: other countries don't use the US 10-digit system at all, and even within the US, a shipment specified as sella or golden sella can land under the parboiled line (1006.30.10, 11.2% ad valorem) instead of the "other" line the buyer researched (1.4 US cents per kilogram) — two structurally different duties, not a small variance.

A second failure, specific to 2026, is budgeting a US landed cost off the pre-July rate. Scenario: an importer locks a container price in May 2026, calculates duty at 1.4 US cents per kilogram the way every reference page online described it at the time, and only discovers the additional 10% Section 301 duty when the customs broker's entry summary comes back after the 24 July 2026 effective date — by which point the shipment is already afloat and the buyer's own resale pricing was set on the old number. Checking a reference page's publication date matters as much as checking its content; a "2025 update" or even an early-2026 HS-code guide predates this change.

A third, UK-specific failure runs the opposite direction: assuming the CETA's duty-free reporting on basmati has already been applied to your exact commodity code without checking, and discovering at entry that the preference requires a certificate of origin you didn't request because you assumed the exemption was automatic. FTA preferences are almost never automatic — they require the correct document, issued against the correct scheme, presented at the correct time.

Fourth: assuming "basic foodstuff" exemptions (the GCC's treatment of rice) are permanent and uniform across all six member states. They're a current policy position, not a treaty-locked rate, and Saudi Arabia's own 2026 tariff-schedule amendments on other agricultural lines are a reminder that these lists do get revised — confirm before, not after, a large multi-container programme.